Woodside Energy, Australia’s biggest oil and gas company and renowned climate wrecker, held its annual general meeting (AGM) on 23 April.
As usual, the company couldn’t escape scrutiny for its dangerous oil and gas expansion plans, from a significant rally outside the AGM venue to several protestors causing disruptions inside the meeting room.
But when it comes to major investor votes, two particular investors stand out: HESTA and Aware Super.
HESTA
In good news, HESTA took a positive step forward this year by publishing a statement scrutinising Woodside’s oil and gas expansion strategy! The fund noted that:
- Woodside’s current strategy does not adequately mitigate the climate risk posed by its focus on oil and gas expansion.
- It would like to see Woodside’s board challenge the assumptions underpinning the company’s oil and gas growth-focused strategy.
- It doesn’t believe the board’s sustainability committee has the necessary skills to deliver a more ambitious climate transition approach.
To back this commentary up, HESTA also voted against the re-election of two members on the board’s sustainability committee, as well as against CEO bonuses and executive pay arrangements.
Take action!
Aware Super
In worse news, Aware Super took a major step backwards by voting for all director re-elections at Woodside this year. This is despite having voted against the re-election of multiple key board directors between 2023 and 2025, to voice its “dissatisfaction” with Woodside’s climate strategy and signal “…displeasure over the company’s efforts to cut emissions.”
This is the first time since 2022 that Aware Super hasn’t sought board accountability through binding director votes at Woodside.
Aware Super has not disclosed a rationale for why it backed off pressure and supported the re-election of four directors on the sustainability committee this year, despite no material progress from Woodside towards delivering a Paris-aligned climate transition plan.
By weakening its public scrutiny of Woodside’s board, Aware Super has backpedalled on climate action and sent confusing signals about its stewardship of major polluters.
Aware Super must demonstrate its climate commitments are more than greenwash by taking a clear stance against Woodside’s dangerous oil and gas expansion plans.
AustralianSuper
A blog post about investor votes at Woodside wouldn’t be complete without mentioning the company’s second largest shareholder and perennial climate laggard, AustralianSuper.
An AustralianSuper spokesperson told Reuters that the fund had “voted in favour of the CEO’s share grant and the non-executive directors” at Woodside’s AGM this year. This should come as no surprise, given AustralianSuper’s unwavering support for Woodside’s board director re-elections over the years: but it’s not good enough.
AustralianSuper is responsible for the retirement savings of millions of Australians and has a duty to manage the long-term risks posed by climate change. This means using its position as a major investor to demand and deliver an end to new and expanded fossil fuel projects pursued by investee companies, such as Woodside’s Browse liquefied natural gas (LNG) export project.

